Admit diverse behaviors that act as symbolic borders. These borders will have to not be

Admit diverse behaviors that act as symbolic borders. These borders will have to not be blurred, thereby avoiding the introduction of a (CAY10505 web reprehensible) element of the street (illness, condom) inside the residence space.Prevention methods: “risk groups, lady of the home, and condom”We have observed that minimizing the severity of AIDS did not avert its meaning as a threat. Nonetheless, this threat is bounded by the notion of “risk group” and by the category of “street” (as opposed to “home”). So, it is actually inside the middle of PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21261711 this array of which means that the protection tactics, stated by the respondents, get sense and orientation leading towards the adoption of exclusive (but unprotected) sex with all the “woman from the house”, or even the use of condoms with “women in the street”. Men and women identified by respondents as belonging to “risk groups” nevertheless refer to the classic groups identified by epidemiologists during the initial phase in the epidemic, within the late 1980s: homosexuals, drug customers, and sex professionals. Respondents exclude “women in the house” and themselves from these groups, indicating low self-perception of threat. She (wife) has the confidence that I’m on the road, but alone. And I also have confidence that she also respects me and is alone. (…) We’re not (…) a part of the threat group (…) they may be people who use drugs (…) with quite a few partners. (r. ten, 51 years old) Thus, avoiding sexual relations with numerous men and women specifically, “prostitutes, girls of your street, and fags” restricting them (almost) exclusively for the “woman from the house”, was regarded by respondents as an excellent preventive strategy, even though it is actually of tough execution. I assume it prevents [AIDS], after you don’t go out with any woman however the woman with the residence. (…) Through the woman 1 gets it also, but in the fag is extra assured. (r. 7, 49 years old) Respondents categorize subjects and conditions, present in their contexts of social interaction, to measure various degrees of threat. The category “woman of the house” will not be limited only to the wife, also involving females that have certain attributes in the space from the “house”. This can be, hence, a “language of relations” (more than substantive attribute!) as Goffman advocates about stigma a language made in a broader internet of meanings. Among the respondents, one example is, doesn’t use condoms within the extramarital relationship having a “girlfriend”. The truth that the “girlfriend” is married to a different man (taking the location of “woman of the house”), additionally to the long term “dating”, justifies for him the unprotected sex. When I’m dating from time to time it passes, without the need of a condom. But not anyone (…) There is a lady … but I know her for nine years (…) In some cases, I don’t use condom, no. But if I get a woman I don’t know, I have to utilize. (…) She’s a married lady. (…) I generally pass by there, I see her all of the time. (r. 12, 54 years old) We see that the use of condoms, although not constant, is more related towards the space in the “street”, as a way to meet the so-called “men’s needs” for sex, possibly a lot more present in extended routes. Lots of in the females who populate the contexts of social interaction of truck drivers, specially those involved with sexual service, are viewed as to be “anyone”; thatDOI:ten.1590S1518-8787.Vulnerability of truck drivers to HIVAIDSMagno L Castellanos MEPis, as someone with no bonds and who has no major concerns with the danger of infection by diseases “rotten women” inside the words of a inte.