7, -85.27495. Holotype. in CNC. Specimen labels: 1. DHJPAR0043018. 2. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector Rincon Rain Forest, Estaci Caribe, 16.ii.2011, 10.90187 , -85.27495 , 415m, DHJPAR0043018. 3. Voucher: D.H.Janzen W.Hallwachs, DB: http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu, Area de Conservaci Guanacaste, COSTA RICA, 11-SRNP-40820. Paratypes. 1 (CNC). COSTA RICA: Guanacaste, ACG database code: DHJPAR0040377. Description. Female. Body color: body purchase I-BRD9 mostly dark except for some sternites which may be pale. Antenna color: scape and/or pedicel pale, flagellum dark. Coxae color (pro-, meso-, metacoxa): dark, dark, dark. Femora color (pro-, meso-, metafemur): pale, pale, mostly pale but posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tibiae color (pro, meso-, metatibia): pale, pale, pale. Tegula and humeral complex color: both pale. Pterostigma color: dark with pale spot at base. Fore wing veins color: mostly dark (a few veins may be unpigmented). Antenna length/body length: antenna about as long as body (head to apex of metasoma); if slightly shorter, at least extending beyond anter-Review of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)…ior 0.7 metasoma length. Body in Biotin-VAD-FMKMedChemExpress Biotin-VAD-FMK lateral view: not distinctly flattened dorso entrally. Body length (head to apex of metasoma): 3.3?.4 mm. Fore wing length: 3.3?.4 mm. Ocular cellar line/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.3?.5. Interocellar distance/ posterior ocellus diameter: 1.7?.9. Antennal flagellomerus 2 length/width: 2.6?.8. Antennal flagellomerus 14 length/width: 1.4?.6. Length of flagellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.3?.5. Tarsal claws: with single basal spine ike seta. Metafemur length/width: 3.0?.1. Metatibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length: 0.4?.5. Anteromesoscutum: mostly with deep, dense punctures (separated by less than 2.0 ?its maximum diameter). Mesoscutellar disc: with punctures near margins, central part mostly smooth. Number of pits in scutoscutellar sulcus: 7 or 8. Maximum height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum: 0.4?.5. Propodeum areola: completely defined by carinae, including transverse carina extending to spiracle. Propodeum background sculpture: mostly sculptured. Mediotergite 1 length/ width at posterior margin: 1.7?.9. Mediotergite 1 shape: clearly widening towards posterior margin. Mediotergite 1 sculpture: mostly sculptured, excavated area centrally with transverse striation inside and/or a polished knob centrally on posterior margin of mediotergite. Mediotergite 2 width at posterior margin/length: 4.0?.3. Mediotergite 2 sculpture: mostly smooth, with weak sculpture on anterior margin. Outer margin of hypopygium: with a wide, medially folded, transparent, semi esclerotized area; usually with 4 or more pleats. Ovipositor thickness: about same width throughout its length. Ovipositor sheaths length/metatibial length: 1.4?.5. Length of fore wing veins r/2RS: 1.4?.6. Length of fore wing veins 2RS/2M: 1.7?.8. Length of fore wing veins 2M/(RS+M)b: 0.5?.6. Pterostigma length/width: 2.6?.0. Point of insertion of vein r in pterostigma: clearly beyond half way point length of pterostigma. Angle of vein r with fore wing anterior margin: clearly outwards, inclined towards fore wing apex. Shape of junction of veins r and 2RS in fore wing: distinctly but not strongly angled. Male. Unknown. Molecular data. Sequences in BOLD: 7, barcode compliant sequences: 7. Biology/ecology. Solitary. Host: Tortricidae, Paramorbia Brown001DHJ03. Distribution. Costa.7, -85.27495. Holotype. in CNC. Specimen labels: 1. DHJPAR0043018. 2. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector Rincon Rain Forest, Estaci Caribe, 16.ii.2011, 10.90187 , -85.27495 , 415m, DHJPAR0043018. 3. Voucher: D.H.Janzen W.Hallwachs, DB: http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu, Area de Conservaci Guanacaste, COSTA RICA, 11-SRNP-40820. Paratypes. 1 (CNC). COSTA RICA: Guanacaste, ACG database code: DHJPAR0040377. Description. Female. Body color: body mostly dark except for some sternites which may be pale. Antenna color: scape and/or pedicel pale, flagellum dark. Coxae color (pro-, meso-, metacoxa): dark, dark, dark. Femora color (pro-, meso-, metafemur): pale, pale, mostly pale but posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tibiae color (pro, meso-, metatibia): pale, pale, pale. Tegula and humeral complex color: both pale. Pterostigma color: dark with pale spot at base. Fore wing veins color: mostly dark (a few veins may be unpigmented). Antenna length/body length: antenna about as long as body (head to apex of metasoma); if slightly shorter, at least extending beyond anter-Review of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)…ior 0.7 metasoma length. Body in lateral view: not distinctly flattened dorso entrally. Body length (head to apex of metasoma): 3.3?.4 mm. Fore wing length: 3.3?.4 mm. Ocular cellar line/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.3?.5. Interocellar distance/ posterior ocellus diameter: 1.7?.9. Antennal flagellomerus 2 length/width: 2.6?.8. Antennal flagellomerus 14 length/width: 1.4?.6. Length of flagellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.3?.5. Tarsal claws: with single basal spine ike seta. Metafemur length/width: 3.0?.1. Metatibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length: 0.4?.5. Anteromesoscutum: mostly with deep, dense punctures (separated by less than 2.0 ?its maximum diameter). Mesoscutellar disc: with punctures near margins, central part mostly smooth. Number of pits in scutoscutellar sulcus: 7 or 8. Maximum height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum: 0.4?.5. Propodeum areola: completely defined by carinae, including transverse carina extending to spiracle. Propodeum background sculpture: mostly sculptured. Mediotergite 1 length/ width at posterior margin: 1.7?.9. Mediotergite 1 shape: clearly widening towards posterior margin. Mediotergite 1 sculpture: mostly sculptured, excavated area centrally with transverse striation inside and/or a polished knob centrally on posterior margin of mediotergite. Mediotergite 2 width at posterior margin/length: 4.0?.3. Mediotergite 2 sculpture: mostly smooth, with weak sculpture on anterior margin. Outer margin of hypopygium: with a wide, medially folded, transparent, semi esclerotized area; usually with 4 or more pleats. Ovipositor thickness: about same width throughout its length. Ovipositor sheaths length/metatibial length: 1.4?.5. Length of fore wing veins r/2RS: 1.4?.6. Length of fore wing veins 2RS/2M: 1.7?.8. Length of fore wing veins 2M/(RS+M)b: 0.5?.6. Pterostigma length/width: 2.6?.0. Point of insertion of vein r in pterostigma: clearly beyond half way point length of pterostigma. Angle of vein r with fore wing anterior margin: clearly outwards, inclined towards fore wing apex. Shape of junction of veins r and 2RS in fore wing: distinctly but not strongly angled. Male. Unknown. Molecular data. Sequences in BOLD: 7, barcode compliant sequences: 7. Biology/ecology. Solitary. Host: Tortricidae, Paramorbia Brown001DHJ03. Distribution. Costa.
Related Posts
Ain (mETC) [11820]. It truly is believed that two of oxygen is converted to
Ain (mETC) [11820]. It truly is believed that two of oxygen is converted to ROS by mETC [130]. Accordingly, it is really interesting to mention that selective prolonged activation of autophagy, these kinds of as procedure with mETC inhibitors of complicated I (rotenone) and II (TTFA) in most cancers cells, may very well be a […]
Of pro-inflammatory cytokines by patients' monocytes. All the above data strongly recommend that soluble issue(s)
Of pro-inflammatory cytokines by patients’ monocytes. All the above data strongly recommend that soluble issue(s) present in the BM of MDS individuals apparently induce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by MDS and standard BM monocytes by means of a TLR4-mediated pathway.cells; nevertheless, it remains inside cells undergoing apoptosis and this mechanism seems to act protectively, […]
Gy per se, since, at that point in time, the scarcityGy per se, due to
Gy per se, since, at that point in time, the scarcityGy per se, due to the fact, at that point in time, the scarcity of mechanistic information and also the limited theoretical understanding in the biological complexity of carcinogenesis produced it as well challenging to address these concerns adequately. Despite the fact that these older […]