Haracterization of C. jejuni LOSs from patients with GBS associated with anti-GM1b antibodiesPatients 1 to 5 with GBS harbored the anti-GM1b antibodies, but neither anti-GM1 nor antiGD1a antibodies (Table 1). All the 5 patients had anti-cM1/D1a IgG antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies detected both GM1 and GD1a epitopes on the LOSs of the C. jejuni isolates obtained from the 5 patients. All the 5 isolates had class A LOS biosynthesis locus and cstII encoding the mono-functional CstII (Thr51) variant, both of which are associated with the biosynthesis of GM1-like and GD1a-like LOSs [20]. Although these genotypic STI-571 cancer results suggested GM1 and GD1a mimicry, structural analysis was required to rule out the presence of a GM1b epitope that could have triggered the anti-GM1b antibody production in these patients.Table 1. IgG antibody titers in Guillain-Barr?syndrome patients from whom C. jejuni was isolated and who had anti-GM1/GD1a complex antibodies, but neither anti-GM1 nor anti-GD1a antibodies. IgG antibodies to (titer) Patient 1 Age/Sex 24/M Isolated ganglioside a GM1b (32,000) Ganglioside- complex b GM1/GD1a (16,000) GM1/GT1b (4,000) GD1a/GD1b (500) 2 3 4 81/F 26/M 16/F GM1b (16,000) GM1b (32,000) GM1b (128,000) GM1/GD1a (500) GM1/GD1a (1,000) GM1/GD1a (8,000) GM1/GT1b (4,000) GD1a/GD1b (1,000) 5 13/M GM1b (64,000) GD1b (2,000) GM1/GD1a (2,000) GM1/GT1b (1,000) GD1a/GD1b (1,000)a bTested antigens were GM1, GM1b, GM2, GD1a, GalNAc-GD1a, GD1b, GD2, GT1a, GT1b, and GQ1b gangliosides. Tested antigens were GM1/GD1a, GM1/GD1b, GM1/GT1b, GD1a/GD1b, GD1a/GT1b, and GD1b/GT1b complexes.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124004.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124004 April 13,4/Campylobacter LOS Complex in GBSCapillary electrophoresis coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (CE-ESI-MS) was performed to analyze O-deacylated samples and to propose the LOS outer core structures for the 2 isolates (GC016 and GC105) from Patients 1 and 3, respectively. The CE-ESI-MS data showed mass species with either 1 or 2 sialic acids (S1 Table), which are proposed to be derived from GM1 and GD1a mimicry (Fig 1B). The glycosyltransferase variants in the LOS biosynthesis locus of GC016 and GC105 are consistent with GM1/GD1a mimicry with a mono-functional CstII (Thr51) that will transfer a single sialic acid to the galactose residues. GM1b mimicry was ruled out because the CgtA (-1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase) and CgtB (-1,3-galactosyltransferase) variants are specific to sialylated acceptors, which implies that the inner galactose residue must be substituted with a sialic acid. Based on the relative abundance of the quadruply charged ions for each mass species (data not shown), we estimated that the ratio of GM1:GD1a mimics was 1:3 for GC016, whereas it was estimated to be 3:1 for GC105. GM1-like and GD1a-like LOSs of C. jejuni (GC016) were treated with the A. ureafaciens neuraminidase. The treatment resulted in a decrease of the anti-GD1a antibody binding to the LOS and an increase of the anti-GM1 antibody binding (Fig 1C), indicating that GD1a-like LOS was converted to GM1-like LOS. cM1/D1a serum (S382) IgG antibodies were absorbed by cM1/D1a and GM1/GD1a-like LOS, but not by the neuraminidase-treated GC016 LOS or GM1/GM2-like LOS (Fig 1D). In contrast, the GM1b-specific serum (S8056) bound to the GM1/GD1a-like LOS, but not to the GM1-like LOS alone, when tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and thin-layer Belinostat chemical information chromatography-immunostaining (data not sh.Haracterization of C. jejuni LOSs from patients with GBS associated with anti-GM1b antibodiesPatients 1 to 5 with GBS harbored the anti-GM1b antibodies, but neither anti-GM1 nor antiGD1a antibodies (Table 1). All the 5 patients had anti-cM1/D1a IgG antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies detected both GM1 and GD1a epitopes on the LOSs of the C. jejuni isolates obtained from the 5 patients. All the 5 isolates had class A LOS biosynthesis locus and cstII encoding the mono-functional CstII (Thr51) variant, both of which are associated with the biosynthesis of GM1-like and GD1a-like LOSs [20]. Although these genotypic results suggested GM1 and GD1a mimicry, structural analysis was required to rule out the presence of a GM1b epitope that could have triggered the anti-GM1b antibody production in these patients.Table 1. IgG antibody titers in Guillain-Barr?syndrome patients from whom C. jejuni was isolated and who had anti-GM1/GD1a complex antibodies, but neither anti-GM1 nor anti-GD1a antibodies. IgG antibodies to (titer) Patient 1 Age/Sex 24/M Isolated ganglioside a GM1b (32,000) Ganglioside- complex b GM1/GD1a (16,000) GM1/GT1b (4,000) GD1a/GD1b (500) 2 3 4 81/F 26/M 16/F GM1b (16,000) GM1b (32,000) GM1b (128,000) GM1/GD1a (500) GM1/GD1a (1,000) GM1/GD1a (8,000) GM1/GT1b (4,000) GD1a/GD1b (1,000) 5 13/M GM1b (64,000) GD1b (2,000) GM1/GD1a (2,000) GM1/GT1b (1,000) GD1a/GD1b (1,000)a bTested antigens were GM1, GM1b, GM2, GD1a, GalNAc-GD1a, GD1b, GD2, GT1a, GT1b, and GQ1b gangliosides. Tested antigens were GM1/GD1a, GM1/GD1b, GM1/GT1b, GD1a/GD1b, GD1a/GT1b, and GD1b/GT1b complexes.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124004.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124004 April 13,4/Campylobacter LOS Complex in GBSCapillary electrophoresis coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (CE-ESI-MS) was performed to analyze O-deacylated samples and to propose the LOS outer core structures for the 2 isolates (GC016 and GC105) from Patients 1 and 3, respectively. The CE-ESI-MS data showed mass species with either 1 or 2 sialic acids (S1 Table), which are proposed to be derived from GM1 and GD1a mimicry (Fig 1B). The glycosyltransferase variants in the LOS biosynthesis locus of GC016 and GC105 are consistent with GM1/GD1a mimicry with a mono-functional CstII (Thr51) that will transfer a single sialic acid to the galactose residues. GM1b mimicry was ruled out because the CgtA (-1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase) and CgtB (-1,3-galactosyltransferase) variants are specific to sialylated acceptors, which implies that the inner galactose residue must be substituted with a sialic acid. Based on the relative abundance of the quadruply charged ions for each mass species (data not shown), we estimated that the ratio of GM1:GD1a mimics was 1:3 for GC016, whereas it was estimated to be 3:1 for GC105. GM1-like and GD1a-like LOSs of C. jejuni (GC016) were treated with the A. ureafaciens neuraminidase. The treatment resulted in a decrease of the anti-GD1a antibody binding to the LOS and an increase of the anti-GM1 antibody binding (Fig 1C), indicating that GD1a-like LOS was converted to GM1-like LOS. cM1/D1a serum (S382) IgG antibodies were absorbed by cM1/D1a and GM1/GD1a-like LOS, but not by the neuraminidase-treated GC016 LOS or GM1/GM2-like LOS (Fig 1D). In contrast, the GM1b-specific serum (S8056) bound to the GM1/GD1a-like LOS, but not to the GM1-like LOS alone, when tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and thin-layer chromatography-immunostaining (data not sh.
Related Posts
Variant alleles (*28/ *28) compared with wild-type alleles (*1/*1). The response price was also
Variant alleles (*28/ *28) compared with wild-type alleles (*1/*1). The response price was also higher in *28/*28 patients compared with *1/*1 individuals, having a non-significant survival benefit for *28/*28 genotype, top for the conclusion that irinotecan dose reduction in patients carrying a UGT1A1*28 allele could not be supported [99]. The reader is referred to a […]
Ethod for the node selection in the network.Figure 5. End-to-end delayEthod for the node choice
Ethod for the node selection in the network.Figure 5. End-to-end delayEthod for the node choice inside the network.Figure 5. End-to-end delay of the proposed DBG technique. Table five. The end-to-end delay on the proposed DBG technique. Nodes 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 one hundred Pareto Optimal [16] 0 1.26 1.34 […]
Imilar scores for the three predictors. (TIF) Figure S8 Kaplan-Meier overall
Imilar scores for the three predictors. (TIF) Figure S8 Kaplan-Meier overall survival stratification between COXEN-matched and unmatched patients in the TCGA-448 cohort. (A) all patients (B) platinum-sensitive patients, (C) platinum-resistant patients. (TIF) Figure S9 Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival stratification between COXEN-matched and unmatched patients in the TCGA-448 cohort. (A) all patients (B) platinum-sensitive patients, (C) platinum-resistant […]