Whether or not these effects are found across subpopulations. A consistent trend shows African American youth are more likely to be placed in kinship foster care than other populations (Smith Devore, 2004; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Researchers have theorized that the disproportionate placement of African American youth in kinship foster care relates to cultural assumptions and familial willingness such as large extended family networks of support. Indeed, African American families are more likely to rely on kin or fictive kin in times of need (Brown, Cohon, Wheeler, 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Additionally, others suggest kinship care represents a way to keep children in their families and communities (Bartholet, 2009). While there is evidence to suggest that high rates of child welfare service involvement in predominantly African American communities may adversely affect parental authority and neighborhood cohesion (Roberts, 2008), it is possible the desire to respond through use of kinship care may not be providing these youth with the best placement (Bartholet, 2009). Thus, it is important to identify whether or not this placement is more beneficial than traditional foster care settings for African American youth.Contextual Factors in Kinship Foster CareGiven its disproportionate use, research that identifies MG-132 web conditions under which kinship placements support the mental health of African American youth is especially important. Some researchers and advocates express concern that children being placed in kinship foster care move to homes similar to those from which they have been removed (Ehrle Geen,J Soc Serv Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 25.Rufa and FowlerPage2002). The apparent lack of resources in many kinship foster families may occur at multiple levels of contextual influence. A number of possible factors have been theorized but not empirically tested. On a broader scale, kinship homes tend to be in more chaotic neighborhoods than nonkinship homes (Berrick, 1997). Research indicates that children who live in impoverished neighborhoods exhibit worse mental health outcomes, such as anxiety, depression, and conduct disorder symptoms (Leventhal Brooks-Gunn, 2003; Meier, Slutske, Arndt, Cadoret, 2008). African American families may be more likely to accept the challenges of kinship care (Brown et al., 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008), but may also do so while experiencing extremely difficult economic hardships to the detriment of mental health outcomes. More proximally, demographic characteristics of caregivers may also be relevant to children’s mental health. Many kinship caregivers are UNC0642 cost grandmothers, some of whom have health problems that come with old age (Iglehart, 1994; Raphel, 2008; Zinn, 2012). In a qualitative study examining what factors promoted or inhibited effective foster caregiving, kinship foster caregivers reported a significant age disparity (such as between a grandmother and a teenage child), which was a barrier to successful fostering (Coakley, Cuddeback, Buehler Cox, 2007). Another study of characteristics of caregiving environments based on a nationally representative sample found 75 of kinship caregivers were 40 years old or older and reported significantly worse physical health than nonkinship caregivers (Barth et al., 2008a). Old age and poor physical health of the caregiver may be stressors for children that predict better or poorer outcomes for kinshi.Whether or not these effects are found across subpopulations. A consistent trend shows African American youth are more likely to be placed in kinship foster care than other populations (Smith Devore, 2004; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Researchers have theorized that the disproportionate placement of African American youth in kinship foster care relates to cultural assumptions and familial willingness such as large extended family networks of support. Indeed, African American families are more likely to rely on kin or fictive kin in times of need (Brown, Cohon, Wheeler, 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008; Swann Sylvester, 2006). Additionally, others suggest kinship care represents a way to keep children in their families and communities (Bartholet, 2009). While there is evidence to suggest that high rates of child welfare service involvement in predominantly African American communities may adversely affect parental authority and neighborhood cohesion (Roberts, 2008), it is possible the desire to respond through use of kinship care may not be providing these youth with the best placement (Bartholet, 2009). Thus, it is important to identify whether or not this placement is more beneficial than traditional foster care settings for African American youth.Contextual Factors in Kinship Foster CareGiven its disproportionate use, research that identifies conditions under which kinship placements support the mental health of African American youth is especially important. Some researchers and advocates express concern that children being placed in kinship foster care move to homes similar to those from which they have been removed (Ehrle Geen,J Soc Serv Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 February 25.Rufa and FowlerPage2002). The apparent lack of resources in many kinship foster families may occur at multiple levels of contextual influence. A number of possible factors have been theorized but not empirically tested. On a broader scale, kinship homes tend to be in more chaotic neighborhoods than nonkinship homes (Berrick, 1997). Research indicates that children who live in impoverished neighborhoods exhibit worse mental health outcomes, such as anxiety, depression, and conduct disorder symptoms (Leventhal Brooks-Gunn, 2003; Meier, Slutske, Arndt, Cadoret, 2008). African American families may be more likely to accept the challenges of kinship care (Brown et al., 2002; Harris Skyles, 2008), but may also do so while experiencing extremely difficult economic hardships to the detriment of mental health outcomes. More proximally, demographic characteristics of caregivers may also be relevant to children’s mental health. Many kinship caregivers are grandmothers, some of whom have health problems that come with old age (Iglehart, 1994; Raphel, 2008; Zinn, 2012). In a qualitative study examining what factors promoted or inhibited effective foster caregiving, kinship foster caregivers reported a significant age disparity (such as between a grandmother and a teenage child), which was a barrier to successful fostering (Coakley, Cuddeback, Buehler Cox, 2007). Another study of characteristics of caregiving environments based on a nationally representative sample found 75 of kinship caregivers were 40 years old or older and reported significantly worse physical health than nonkinship caregivers (Barth et al., 2008a). Old age and poor physical health of the caregiver may be stressors for children that predict better or poorer outcomes for kinshi.
Related Posts
Ts prognostic worth has never been systematically examined. Thus, the aim in the present study
Ts prognostic worth has never been systematically examined. Thus, the aim in the present study was to retrospectively evaluate Neudesin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum of major brain tumor individuals and examine them to non-tumoral individuals. In our previous study we revealed considerable CCR9 Proteins Biological Activity differences among the astrocytic brain tumor […]
Cytes in response to interleukin-2 stimulation50 gives yet a different example. four.two Chemistry of DNA
Cytes in response to interleukin-2 stimulation50 gives yet a different example. four.two Chemistry of DNA demethylation In contrast to the well-studied biology of DNA methylation in mammals, the enzymatic mechanism of active demethylation had long remained elusive and controversial (reviewed in 44, 51). The basic chemical issue for direct removal from the 5-methyl group in […]
Ales showed coincident sociospatial behavior, as expected beneath a passive associationAles showed coincident sociospatial behavior,
Ales showed coincident sociospatial behavior, as expected beneath a passive associationAles showed coincident sociospatial behavior, as anticipated under a passive association situation. Having said that, some contrasting results observed for individual AM are worth noting. While not distinctive in terms of her reproductive status, AM was by far the most current immigrant among these analyzed. […]